Avian 'flu: the politics and policy processes of a global response
Challenges for politics and processes
The potential of human-human transmission of virulent influenza derived from an avian flu viral strain has raised alarm bells across the world. The prospect of a major public health catastrophe on the scale of that experienced in 1918 – or worse - has meant considerable resources have been invested in developing surveillance and response systems.
But how effective are these responses? And who are the likely winners and losers? Are such response systems robust, durable and resilient, in the face of unknown, and perhaps unknowable, shocks and stresses, and a complex and dynamic viral ecology?
The objective of this research project is to investigate the politics of policy processes surrounding the response to Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), identifying key actors and networks and associated narratives and practices of policy.
The aim is to interrogate the assumptions being made, and explore different framings in the debate, including those often not heard in mainstream policy circles. The research focuses on both the international level, working with the key agencies involved in the global response, and the country level, engaging with four countries in SE Asia – Cambodia, Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam. The overall analysis of the political economy of policy will reveal key challenges, obstacles and opportunities for responding to avian flu – and potentially other global epidemics.
Working with collaborators in international agencies and national programmes, as well as funding agencies, the aim will be to develop a fresh and critical reflection on the current response to the HPAI challenge, asking questions about the distributional and sustainability consequences of the existing policy response.
The project
Supported by the FAO (UN Food and Agriculture Organisation) Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative as part of a wider set of activities under the DFID funded Pro-Poor HPAI Risk Reduction Project, the project is unfolding in a number of phases:
i) Scoping study
This involved a literature review and included an assessment of:
- the avian flu ‘time line’, identifying key policy events, moments and shifts.
- key narratives driving policy debate from different sources.
- actor networks associated with international policy change around avian flu.
Scoping Study:
International Policy Processes & HPAI - A Scoping Study. Ian Scoones and Paul Foster. Nov 07 (pdf 736kb)
ii) International policy processes study
This study is on-going and involves a more detailed assessment of the international response, involving discussions with key players in FAO, Rome; WHO (World Health Organisation), Geneva; and OIE (World Animal Health Organisation), Paris, as well as other development agencies including the World Bank, USAID, the European Commission and DFID. The aim will be to assess the degree to which the emerging international response is effective, equitable and resilient.
iii) Country studies – South East Asia
Clearly the consequence of ‘international’ policy can only be understood in context. Country level studies will be carried out to look at the intersection of global and national/local processes. These will be carried out in Cambodia, Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam. Each country study will include the following:
- An overview of policy making and political economy contexts for the country, particularly as related to avian flu.
- An assessment of the avian flu ‘time line’, identifying key policy events, moments and shifts, based initially on secondary/Internet based material and confirmed through interviews.
- An assessment of key policy narratives/framings driving policy debate from different actor networks/groupings.
- A mapping of the actor networks associated with policy change around avian flu in the country (including national/international actors, and those from business, farming, veterinary and other groups).
- An examination of competing interests and politics involved in making avian flu policy and the consequences for the design and implementation of response mechanisms.
- An evaluation of both the distributional consequences (who wins/loses) and the resilience implications of policy responses.
The third phase starts in April 2008 with a methodology workshop to plan the field phase of this work.
For more information and material on this project, see the Pro-Poor HPAI Risk Reduction Project website
Backgrounder
Framing policy: the case of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI)
Research Partners
- Overall project coordinator: Ian Scoones, Professorial Fellow, IDS and co-director STEPS Centre. Ian trained as a biologist, but currently works on institutional and policy questions and the relationships between science, policy and development.
- Thailand case study: Rachel Safman, Asst Professor, National University of Singapore. Rachel trained in cell/molecular biology, PhD in sociology, epidemiology, international health and development and health, looking in particular on the influence which health events exert on development at the local - family/community - and national level. She is also interested in local governance.
- Vietnam case study: Vu Tuong, Asst Professor, Center for Contemporary Conflict, Naval Postgraduate School/National University of Singapore. Work includes comparative political development; state origins; contentious mass politics; research methodology; east and southeast Asia. PPLPI paper.
- Cambodia case study, Sophal Ear, Asst Professor, Dept of Public Administration, Maxwell School Syracuse/Naval Postrgraduate School, Monterey, California. Work includes comparative politics and political economy of development; southeast Asia; post-conflict reconstruction (particularly Cambodia); aid effectiveness and governance] PPLPI paper
- Indonesia case study - Paul Forster – STEPS Centre DPhil based at IDS
This study is part of a broader initiative of the FAO’s Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative. Contact: Joachim Otte
Publications
-
Scoping Study:
International Policy Processes & HPAI - A Scoping Study. Ian Scoones and Paul Foster. Nov 07 (pdf 736kb)
- The final project report and country studies will be available in late 2008
Related research & events
- Workshop: The political economy of HPAI in SE Asia workshop at IDS, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. April 23-25
Workshop report, April 2008 (pdf 324kb)
- For more forthcoming events see the Pro-Poor HPAI Risk Reduction Project event page
- Read an article on this project written for the IDS website
 |
Poultry livelihoods / |
Steps Direct
On this page
related links
external links
